Review showed the "Setting the narrative?" verdict compared across
abstraction levels: a homepage tagline is deliberately broad
("financial infrastructure" covers a chargebacks thread), so
tagline-vs-thread alignment verdicts are unfalsifiable and carry no
information. The signal now ships as PROSE in the entity's narrative
section, fires only when the month's evidence directly bears on the
pitch (supports a specific claim, cuts against one, or is squarely
about the pitched ground), and stays SILENT when the pulse is
orthogonal - omission over a manufactured connection. Claims are
tested at matched altitude (specific claim vs specific thread) and
stay windowed (no trend verbs one 30-day window can't support). The
positioning fetch step survives unchanged and now also grounds the
"What it is" row and brand-noise rejection. All scope gating (people
never, ownerless topics excluded, no pitch from memory) carries over.
Trevin Chow
c1ca1a4e9d