bad1d312ef
Most users never touch FUN_LEVEL. Default medium was shipping a stats
block but rarely a Best Takes block, and when it did it was below the
cluster fold where a synthesizing model had already stopped reading.
A 2,304-upvote Reddit comment ("WHAT?! I reached my monthly limit
just reading this post") on the 2026-04-17 Opus 4.7 run sat inside
cluster 11 and never made it into synthesis. Four coordinated changes:
1. render: promote Best Takes above the cluster list so the synthesizer
sees comedy before it anchors on cluster 1.
2. render: lower medium threshold from 70 to 55 (heuristic maxes at 80),
drop the two-gem floor to one-gem. Default now reliably emits the
block on typical runs.
3. rerank: score individual top_comments by upvote ratio to their parent
thread. A 2,304-upvote comment on a 300-upvote thread now outranks a
400-upvote comment on a 3,400-upvote thread, which is the viral-wit
signal. Handles both the LLM scoring path and the heuristic fallback.
4. render: merge scored comment gems into Best Takes alongside candidate
gems, sorted together. Comment lines show body + parent title +
r/subreddit or @handle + absolute upvotes.
5. SKILL: tell the synthesizer to quote at least two Best Takes entries
verbatim, with an example of the new comment format.
Plan: docs/plans/2026-04-17-001-feat-default-fun-surfacing-plan.md
🤖 Generated with Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) via [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) + Compound Engineering v2.56.1
Co-authored-by: Matt Van Horn <455140+mvanhorn@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
221 lines
8.9 KiB
Python
221 lines
8.9 KiB
Python
"""Tests for the fun judge heuristic fallback in rerank.py."""
|
|
|
|
import sys
|
|
from pathlib import Path
|
|
|
|
import pytest
|
|
|
|
SCRIPTS_DIR = Path(__file__).parent.parent / "scripts"
|
|
sys.path.insert(0, str(SCRIPTS_DIR))
|
|
|
|
from lib import schema
|
|
from lib.rerank import (
|
|
_apply_fun_fallback,
|
|
_apply_single_fun_fallback,
|
|
_extract_comment_text,
|
|
_score_comments_per_candidate,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _make_candidate(
|
|
title: str = "Some Title",
|
|
snippet: str = "",
|
|
engagement: float | None = 0.0,
|
|
top_comments: list[dict] | None = None,
|
|
parent_raw_engagement: int | None = None,
|
|
) -> schema.Candidate:
|
|
"""Build a minimal Candidate with optional source_items carrying top_comments."""
|
|
source_items = []
|
|
if top_comments is not None:
|
|
item_engagement = {"score": parent_raw_engagement} if parent_raw_engagement is not None else {}
|
|
source_items.append(
|
|
schema.SourceItem(
|
|
item_id="si-1",
|
|
source="reddit",
|
|
title=title,
|
|
body="",
|
|
url="https://reddit.com/r/test/1",
|
|
engagement=item_engagement,
|
|
metadata={"top_comments": top_comments},
|
|
)
|
|
)
|
|
return schema.Candidate(
|
|
candidate_id="c-1",
|
|
item_id="i-1",
|
|
source="reddit",
|
|
title=title,
|
|
url="https://reddit.com/r/test/1",
|
|
snippet=snippet,
|
|
subquery_labels=["q1"],
|
|
native_ranks={"reddit": 1},
|
|
local_relevance=0.5,
|
|
freshness=50,
|
|
engagement=engagement,
|
|
source_quality=0.5,
|
|
rrf_score=0.01,
|
|
source_items=source_items,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestFunFallbackCommentText:
|
|
"""Heuristic fallback reads comment text, not just title+snippet."""
|
|
|
|
def test_comment_with_lmao_gets_marker_bonus(self):
|
|
"""A candidate with 'lmao' in a top_comment should get the marker bonus."""
|
|
candidate = _make_candidate(
|
|
title="Boring press conference recap",
|
|
snippet="Coach talked about the game plan.",
|
|
top_comments=[{"body": "lmao this is gold"}],
|
|
)
|
|
_apply_single_fun_fallback(candidate)
|
|
# marker_bonus = 10, should be reflected in fun_score
|
|
assert candidate.fun_score is not None
|
|
assert candidate.fun_score >= 10.0
|
|
assert candidate.fun_explanation == "heuristic-fallback"
|
|
|
|
def test_short_punchy_comment_higher_shortness(self):
|
|
"""A candidate with a short punchy comment should score higher shortness
|
|
bonus compared to one with a very long title and snippet."""
|
|
short_candidate = _make_candidate(
|
|
title="Hot dogs",
|
|
snippet="",
|
|
top_comments=[{"body": "bro what"}],
|
|
)
|
|
long_candidate = _make_candidate(
|
|
title="A very long and detailed analysis of the upcoming season with comprehensive breakdown of every roster move and coaching decision that happened over the past thirty days",
|
|
snippet="This extensive report covers all aspects of the team performance including advanced metrics and historical comparisons going back several decades.",
|
|
top_comments=[{"body": "bro what"}],
|
|
)
|
|
_apply_single_fun_fallback(short_candidate)
|
|
_apply_single_fun_fallback(long_candidate)
|
|
# Both get marker bonus from "bro", but short one gets higher shortness bonus
|
|
assert short_candidate.fun_score > long_candidate.fun_score
|
|
|
|
def test_no_comments_falls_back_to_title_snippet(self):
|
|
"""A candidate with no source_items/comments still scores based on title+snippet."""
|
|
candidate = _make_candidate(
|
|
title="This is hilarious content",
|
|
snippet="Very funny stuff",
|
|
top_comments=None, # no source_items at all
|
|
)
|
|
_apply_single_fun_fallback(candidate)
|
|
assert candidate.fun_score is not None
|
|
assert candidate.fun_score >= 10.0 # marker bonus from "hilarious"
|
|
assert candidate.fun_explanation == "heuristic-fallback"
|
|
|
|
def test_empty_comment_bodies_no_crash(self):
|
|
"""Candidates with empty comment bodies should not crash."""
|
|
candidate = _make_candidate(
|
|
title="Normal title",
|
|
snippet="Normal snippet",
|
|
top_comments=[
|
|
{"body": ""},
|
|
{"body": None},
|
|
{},
|
|
{"body": "actual comment"},
|
|
],
|
|
)
|
|
_apply_single_fun_fallback(candidate)
|
|
assert candidate.fun_score is not None
|
|
assert candidate.fun_explanation == "heuristic-fallback"
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestScoreCommentsPerCandidate:
|
|
"""Per-comment fun scoring: high-ratio viral comments outrank absolute-high comments on dominant threads."""
|
|
|
|
def test_high_ratio_comment_outranks_low_ratio(self):
|
|
"""A 2304-upvote comment on a 300-upvote parent should score higher than
|
|
a 400-upvote comment on a 3400-upvote parent (high ratio = viral wit)."""
|
|
viral = _make_candidate(
|
|
parent_raw_engagement=300,
|
|
top_comments=[{"body": "WHAT?! I reached my monthly limit just reading this post", "score": 2304}],
|
|
)
|
|
average = _make_candidate(
|
|
parent_raw_engagement=3400,
|
|
top_comments=[{"body": "we can't trust benchmarks anymore and need to re-run them", "score": 400}],
|
|
)
|
|
_score_comments_per_candidate(viral)
|
|
_score_comments_per_candidate(average)
|
|
viral_score = viral.source_items[0].metadata["top_comments"][0]["fun_score"]
|
|
average_score = average.source_items[0].metadata["top_comments"][0]["fun_score"]
|
|
assert viral_score > average_score
|
|
|
|
def test_2304_upvote_comment_on_small_parent_crosses_medium_threshold(self):
|
|
"""The exact Opus 4.7 case: the comment should score >= 55 (medium threshold)."""
|
|
candidate = _make_candidate(
|
|
parent_raw_engagement=300,
|
|
top_comments=[{
|
|
"body": "WHAT?! I reached my monthly limit just reading this post",
|
|
"score": 2304,
|
|
}],
|
|
)
|
|
_score_comments_per_candidate(candidate)
|
|
comment = candidate.source_items[0].metadata["top_comments"][0]
|
|
assert comment["fun_score"] >= 55.0
|
|
|
|
def test_reddit_excerpt_field_also_works(self):
|
|
"""Reddit uses 'excerpt' not 'body'. The scorer must handle that."""
|
|
candidate = _make_candidate(
|
|
parent_raw_engagement=100,
|
|
top_comments=[{"excerpt": "bruh this is gold", "score": 500}],
|
|
)
|
|
_score_comments_per_candidate(candidate)
|
|
comment = candidate.source_items[0].metadata["top_comments"][0]
|
|
assert "fun_score" in comment
|
|
assert comment["fun_score"] > 0
|
|
|
|
def test_no_parent_upvotes_does_not_crash(self):
|
|
"""A candidate without parent engagement still scores comments via the absolute-upvote fallback."""
|
|
candidate = _make_candidate(
|
|
parent_raw_engagement=None,
|
|
top_comments=[{"body": "lmao", "score": 200}],
|
|
)
|
|
_score_comments_per_candidate(candidate)
|
|
comment = candidate.source_items[0].metadata["top_comments"][0]
|
|
assert "fun_score" in comment
|
|
|
|
def test_malformed_comments_skipped(self):
|
|
"""Non-dict entries and missing-body entries are skipped without raising."""
|
|
candidate = _make_candidate(
|
|
parent_raw_engagement=500,
|
|
top_comments=[
|
|
"not a dict", # malformed, still counts toward the top-3 window
|
|
{"body": "", "score": 10}, # empty body within window
|
|
{"body": "valid", "score": 50}, # valid within window
|
|
],
|
|
)
|
|
_score_comments_per_candidate(candidate)
|
|
comments = candidate.source_items[0].metadata["top_comments"]
|
|
# Only the valid one gets a fun_score
|
|
valid = [c for c in comments if isinstance(c, dict) and c.get("fun_score") is not None]
|
|
assert len(valid) == 1
|
|
assert valid[0]["body"] == "valid"
|
|
|
|
def test_score_comments_runs_after_fallback(self):
|
|
"""_apply_fun_fallback wires in comment scoring automatically."""
|
|
candidate = _make_candidate(
|
|
parent_raw_engagement=300,
|
|
top_comments=[{"body": "bro what 😭", "score": 1500}],
|
|
)
|
|
_apply_fun_fallback([candidate])
|
|
comment = candidate.source_items[0].metadata["top_comments"][0]
|
|
assert "fun_score" in comment
|
|
assert candidate.fun_score is not None
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestExtractCommentText:
|
|
"""Verify _extract_comment_text handles edge cases."""
|
|
|
|
def test_extracts_from_top_comments(self):
|
|
candidate = _make_candidate(
|
|
top_comments=[{"body": "first comment"}, {"body": "second comment"}],
|
|
)
|
|
text = _extract_comment_text(candidate)
|
|
assert "first comment" in text
|
|
assert "second comment" in text
|
|
|
|
def test_empty_source_items(self):
|
|
candidate = _make_candidate(top_comments=None)
|
|
text = _extract_comment_text(candidate)
|
|
assert text == ""
|