diff --git a/docs/plans/2026-02-07-fix-citation-source-priority-plan.md b/docs/plans/2026-02-07-fix-citation-source-priority-plan.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 552de82..0000000
--- a/docs/plans/2026-02-07-fix-citation-source-priority-plan.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,97 +0,0 @@
----
-title: "fix: Citation source priority — elevate Reddit/X, tone down web credit"
-type: fix
-date: 2026-02-07
----
-
-# fix: Citation source priority — elevate Reddit/X, tone down web credit
-
-## Problem
-
-The tool's magic is Reddit + X research with real engagement data, but the output makes it look like a web search wrapper. In the Kanye West test, 5/5 inline citations credited web sources (Rolling Stone, Billboard, etc.) while X's 29 posts got one vague mention. Users see a wall of "per Rolling Stone" and think "I could have Googled this."
-
-**Root causes in SKILL.md:**
-
-1. The GOOD citation example is `"per Rolling Stone"` — a web source! This models the wrong behavior.
-2. No explicit "prefer @handles and r/subreddits" citation priority rule
-3. The stats box shows `🌐 Web: 30+ pages` which visually dominates
-4. The "What I learned" section has no instruction to lead with Reddit/X voices
-
-## Proposed Solution — 4 SKILL.md changes
-
-### Change 1: Add explicit citation priority rule
-
-In the CITATION RULE section (~line 195), add a priority order:
-
-```
-CITATION PRIORITY (most to least preferred):
-1. @handles from X — "per @handle" (these prove the tool's unique value)
-2. r/subreddits from Reddit — "per r/subreddit"
-3. Web sources — ONLY when Reddit/X don't cover that specific fact
-
-The tool's value is surfacing what PEOPLE are saying, not what journalists wrote.
-When both a web article and an X post cover the same fact, cite the X post.
-```
-
-### Change 2: Fix the GOOD/BAD citation examples
-
-Current GOOD example teaches web citation:
-```
-GOOD: "His album BULLY is set for March 20 via Gamma, per Rolling Stone."
-```
-
-Replace with Reddit/X-first examples:
-```
-BAD: "His album is set for March 20 (per Rolling Stone; Billboard; Complex)."
-GOOD: "His album BULLY drops March 20 — fans on X are split on the tracklist, per @honest30bgfan_"
-GOOD: "Ye's apology got massive traction on r/hiphopheads with 2K+ upvotes"
-OK (web only when needed): "The Hellwatt Festival runs July 4-18 at RCF Arena, per Billboard"
-```
-
-### Change 3: Reframe stats box — downplay web prominence
-
-Current template gives web equal billing:
-```
-├─ 🌐 Web: {N} pages │ {domain1}, {domain2}, {domain3}
-```
-
-Change to something that positions web as supplementary:
-```
-├─ 🌐 Web: {N} pages (supplementary)
-```
-
-Remove the domain list from the stats tree — it makes web look like the main source. The domains already got credit in any inline citations where they were used.
-
-### Change 4: Add "lead with voices" instruction in synthesis
-
-In the "What I learned" template section, add:
-
-```
-**Lead with people, not publications.** Start each topic with what Reddit/X
-users are saying/feeling, then add web context if needed. The user came here
-for the conversation, not the press release.
-```
-
-## Files to Change
-
-- `SKILL.md` — 4 edits (citation priority, examples, stats template, synthesis instruction)
-
-## Acceptance Criteria
-
-- [x] Citation examples model @handle and r/subreddit format, not web domains
-- [x] Explicit priority rule: X > Reddit > Web for citations
-- [x] Stats box positions web as "supplementary"
-- [x] Synthesis instructions say to lead with people/voices
-- [x] No changes to the Python script or actual research quality
-- [x] Synced to `~/.claude/skills/last30days/SKILL.md`
-
-## What This Does NOT Change
-
-- The actual research still runs Reddit + X + WebSearch in parallel
-- WebSearch results still inform the synthesis (they're great for facts)
-- The quality of the output stays the same — this is purely about attribution framing
-- The Judge Agent still weights Reddit/X higher internally
-
-## Why This Works
-
-It's a presentation fix, not a data fix. The research already prioritizes Reddit/X internally (Judge Agent rules). The problem is the citation instructions then undo that by modeling web citations. By flipping the citation examples and adding a priority rule, the agent will naturally attribute facts to @handles and r/subreddits first, making the output feel like "I talked to the internet for you" rather than "I Googled this for you."