fix(skill): strengthen zero-result hiding and improve Polymarket stats format
Make the "omit 0-result sources" instruction more emphatic (CRITICAL prefix, enumerate all formats to suppress). Change Polymarket stats line to show top 2-3 market odds instead of just top-1. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -339,13 +339,13 @@ KEY PATTERNS from the research:
|
|||||||
├─ 🔵 X: {N} posts │ {N} likes │ {N} reposts
|
├─ 🔵 X: {N} posts │ {N} likes │ {N} reposts
|
||||||
├─ 🔴 YouTube: {N} videos │ {N} views │ {N} with transcripts
|
├─ 🔴 YouTube: {N} videos │ {N} views │ {N} with transcripts
|
||||||
├─ 🟡 HN: {N} stories │ {N} points │ {N} comments
|
├─ 🟡 HN: {N} stories │ {N} points │ {N} comments
|
||||||
├─ 📈 Polymarket: {N} markets │ ${vol} volume │ top odds: {outcome} {pct}%
|
├─ 📊 Polymarket: {N} markets ({short summary of top 2-3 market odds, e.g. "Big 12: 64% Yes, NCAA: 12% Yes"})
|
||||||
├─ 🌐 Web: {N} pages (supplementary)
|
├─ 🌐 Web: {N} pages (supplementary)
|
||||||
└─ 🗣️ Top voices: @{handle1} ({N} likes), @{handle2} │ r/{sub1}, r/{sub2}
|
└─ 🗣️ Top voices: @{handle1} ({N} likes), @{handle2} │ r/{sub1}, r/{sub2}
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Omit any source line that returned 0 results. Do NOT show "0 threads" or "0 stories" lines.
|
**CRITICAL: Omit any source line that returned 0 results.** Do NOT show "0 threads", "0 stories", "0 markets", or "(no results this cycle)". If a source found nothing, DELETE that line entirely - don't include it at all.
|
||||||
NEVER use plain text dashes (-) or pipe (|). ALWAYS use ├─ └─ │ and the emoji.
|
NEVER use plain text dashes (-) or pipe (|). ALWAYS use ├─ └─ │ and the emoji.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**SELF-CHECK before displaying**: Re-read your "What I learned" section. Does it match what the research ACTUALLY says? If you catch yourself projecting your own knowledge instead of the research, rewrite it.
|
**SELF-CHECK before displaying**: Re-read your "What I learned" section. Does it match what the research ACTUALLY says? If you catch yourself projecting your own knowledge instead of the research, rewrite it.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -128,13 +128,13 @@ All agents reported back!
|
|||||||
|- Reddit: {N} threads | {N} upvotes | {N} comments
|
|- Reddit: {N} threads | {N} upvotes | {N} comments
|
||||||
|- X: {N} posts | {N} likes | {N} reposts
|
|- X: {N} posts | {N} likes | {N} reposts
|
||||||
|- YouTube: {N} videos | {N} views | {N} with transcripts
|
|- YouTube: {N} videos | {N} views | {N} with transcripts
|
||||||
|- Polymarket: {N} markets | top odds: {outcome} {pct}%
|
|- Polymarket: {N} markets ({short summary of top 2-3 market odds})
|
||||||
|- Web: {N} pages (supplementary)
|
|- Web: {N} pages (supplementary)
|
||||||
|- Top voices: @{handle1}, @{handle2} | r/{sub1}, r/{sub2}
|
|- Top voices: @{handle1}, @{handle2} | r/{sub1}, r/{sub2}
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Omit any source line that returned 0 results.
|
**CRITICAL: Omit any source line that returned 0 results.** Do NOT show "0 threads", "0 stories", "0 markets", or "(no results this cycle)". If a source found nothing, DELETE that line entirely.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**3. Invitation** with 2-3 specific follow-up suggestions based on research.
|
**3. Invitation** with 2-3 specific follow-up suggestions based on research.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user